Wednesday, December 26, 2007

The Program

Now that this season is behind us, our focus is thankfully turning from the funhouse rear view mirror. As you can see on the left, Notre Dame has been absurdly behind the top programs in the country the last three years in upper class top talent.

But next year the gap begins to close rapidly. For the first time since Bob Davie, Notre Dame will field as many upper class 4 and 5 star players as Michigan. And while ND is still considerably behind Florida and USC, the slope of the talent line in South Bend is rising faster than anywhere else in the country -- which is both hopeful and hurtful. Hurtful because it's painful to see just how far Notre Dame has fallen compare to programs like Michigan, but hopeful in that Notre Dame will pass Michigan in 2009 and rise to the same overall level of talent that Texas had when it won its National Championship. When this year's incoming number one rated recruiting class reaches their junior year, Notre Dame will be at the "program level" -- where it's upper classes are full of top talent without giant holes or gaps.

What are the characteristics of a "program level" contender?

1 - Strong junior, senior and 5th year talent
2 - High (5-star) potential in the sophomore and freshmen classes
3 - Position depth

A "program level" contender has one of two things at most of their starting spots: experience or talent -- and you need both at (and this is a guestimate) 80% of your positions on the field if you're going to contend.

This ensures that if you have to play young players, it's because you can't keep them off the field. It also ensures that you have competition every practice. Sam Young is a great talent, but he's been thrust into the starting role without anyone to push him or mentor him. It's heartening to hear that he's one of the younger players who's taking charge, because he's been a symptom of why Notre Dame hasn't reached program status. There is simply no one to challenge him or push him to be better. Auburn started true freshman on their Offensive line, but it was because they actually beat out senior talent. Building enough depth to create internal competition is one of the key features of a program contender.

Fans are often under the illusion that star ratings=ability to contribute at a championship level immediately. That's not the case. Very few of even five star players are ready to play at a championship level on a full time basis until their junior years. You have to giggle a bit when you hear fans pronounce that "player X or Y isn't as good as we hoped" and the sample pool is a few games of his freshman or sophomore year. There is simply no way you (rationally) can label a true freshman or sophomore a bust early in their careers.

Think about Ryan Grant's performance at Green Bay this season. He's STILL developing and it helps to understand that we're talking about developing players here, which is why seniority, depth and talent are all necessary. Most 5-star recruits DON'T pan out, so you need all three elements to compete on a year in year out basis. All teams are going to have holes and weaknesses, but the best have surrounded their weaknesses with strengths.

Three straight years of top level recruiting will put Notre Dame back in program contention by 2009 and (get those shades) because this year's recruiting class might be the strongest in recent Notre Dame history, the expectations for 2009 and beyond should be nothing less than NC contention every year.

So there's a lot to look forward to, but I don't think we're going to get there without some pain along the way over this next year -- in the next Rock Report I'm going to take a look at pain points for 2008.

5 comments:

greenwoodndfan said...

Wow...really on the mark. A short-term question though...who is going to play inside linebacker next year? The development mentioned in the article is visible on the offensive/defensive lines and outside linebacker...but seems to be lack of development inside???

Anonymous said...

very fine post and good points all. but you're comment about most 5-stars not "panning out" is not accurate. check out BGS analysis of star-rankings and their predictive ability from last summer. their conclusion was that the star-ranking system is still the best determiner of college success for HS players...

Scranton Dave said...

I agree, and while I didnt forsee us being as bad as we were this year, I knew the future looked bright even before this incoming 2008 class. Ive been taking all the heat up here in Penn State land, and I have been getting laughed at since September as I have been saying all along, just wait til 2009. We suffered this year and while next year will be better, we wont be there yet. Look out in 2009 and beyond however.

Anonymous said...

From reliable sources, Omar Hunter may likely renig and ultimately go to UF.

Anonymous said...

From reliable sources, Omar Hunter may go to UF, not ND. Respectfully I hope this message isn't censored like the first was! For whatever reasons, let the blog system work.