I like that Charlie has strong beliefs. We needed someone to take a leadership role when he arrived. But Charlie was, to a certain extent, faking it. He’d never been a head coach and he didn’t fully get it, but I believe he was trying, is trying and has the ability and drive to succeed. I really like that he’s stepped back to evaluate his position. So it appears there could be some learning here that could pay huge dividends. This is a coach who took the Irish to back to back BCS games, the two best seasons since Lou. He's proven he can coach at a high level with the right players. Even so, I've felt a constant insecurity about Weis whose offense teams figured out in a year, who goes for it against all saneness on fourth down, who stubbornly refuses to put the defense on the field first on kickoffs when the offense is putrid, who... oh wait, you can just read my last article for this stuff.
Now as to why you should be positive about this season, I first have to take you back to last season's painful debacle. When there are so many things wrong at one time, there is no fix that works. You cover up one weakness and another breaks and last year was the perfect storm of weakness. We had a green offensive line, green quarterback, green wide receivers and ultimately a green running back. You want to wear green, not be green.
And if multiple parts of the whole are constantly breaking, it’s really impossible to fix the whole. And therein lies the hope for next year.
When things are as abysmally bad on offense as they were last season, it actually doesn’t take
much to realize a great gain. Any one factor moving toward the positive has an exponential domino effect on the rest. For example, if the blocking improves even slightly, Clausen's performance improves measurably (and he really had a great year for the hand and the situation he was dealt.)
I expect the line to make marked improvement both because of physical maturity and coaching technique and scheme changes. I find it hard to believe we won't make a quantum leap in offensive line performance from last year (of course even a quantum leap only gets us to okay.)
With a better offensive line, our running game should be more productive. We have a very good backfield of talent with a mix bruisers and speedsters. Running Backs tend to hit their potential quicker than other positions and with Allen, Hughes and Aldridge we should find an effective mix. I'll withhold judgment on whether I think Weis will really commit to the run.
Jimmy Clausen should also be noticeably better this year as I expect Sharpley to be. Clausen's going to be a star and I expect he'll make better decisions, be able to withstand more hits (17 pounds heavier is the report with lumberjack beard,) and have much more comfort with the system and his receivers.
I also expect our receivers to be good to very good. Grimes, Parris and Kamara all have good potential and game experience under their belts. These three, along with Tate and West should form our core experienced group. Of the freshmen I expect Michael Floyd to play a lot early and that he could be our best receiver by midyear. As I've said before, he's an out of the box ready to play prospect.
Tight End, depending on Yeatman's eligibility shouldn't drop off too much considering we couldn't get the ball to Carlson last year. Ragone is the fastest tightend we've ever had and Rudolph brings size, speed and athleticism to the position.
So there's a lot of hope for our offense. Once we fix the major offensive line woes it will be much simpler to tweak the skill positions where we have more potential than any time since Lou roamed the sidelines.
The maturity of our best talent is still a year away, but I expect to see the potential of the younger players shining through early in 08 and a top 50 offense. The two most important offensive players this year IMO are Clausen and Wenger. Wenger has the toughness to set the tone for the Offensive Line. If our Offensive Line problems can be solved, I think Clausen (assuming he can stay focused and healthy) will have a better career than Quinn, which is saying something.
Defense is another story for another article. In sum, we have a chance to be better next year with a real linebacker coach, more experience and young talent coming up through the ranks.
See, I'm not a hater.
** As an ND aside. I recently worked with former Irish quarterback Tim Koegel and received incredibly positive feedback from our senior executives on his material. If you need to know more about effective presenting, I highly recommend his book both as part of the Irish family and for practical application.
You can find his website at http://www.presentationacademy.com and his book on Amazon.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
A Season of Hope
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


15 comments:
Much better post. I agree, CW has had his faults, he knows he has. I believe we will have maked improvement this year, and the maturity of the talent is still a year away, but I stand by the statement we will have maked improvement.
I do understand now why you waited to make write this article, makes sense.
I am an ND fan through and through, but I am honest about our team. We do have some hurdles to leap, but I think we can do it. Once this core of young talent really starts to understand the game they are going to explode with CW's knowledge of the game. I think we will win and see signs of what's to come early in the season, but come mid-seasons they will start to stride. Don't get me wrong I not saying National Title, I'm just saying descent bowl game and a win.
Vince from CA.
Thank you Rock. My faith is restored. Yes, I am one of those to whom you referred early in "A Season of Hope."
I think this article:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-25-notre-damemar25,1,6560528.story
definitely applies to ND fans, as well.
I found your last post incredibly insightful and cautious of very real issues that face the ND football program.
Are the majority of you really going to sit there and try to argue that Charlie was right for sticking with the pass over and over again despite using the ground game that was a far more sure thing? The situations that Rock Report shared on the Michigan State game were spot on. He's not being negative, he's being realistic.
I thought it was a great post and would hope that someone affiliated with the program took a good read and at least stores some of the suggestions somewhere in the back of his/her mind.
There is still one thing i think has yet to come out in the wash: Evan Sharpley is the best QB we have. JCs spiral and accuracy are nicer, but as a total package- the integral physical abilities and quickness to react of Sharpley, who, by the way, has never had meaningful rep time or media hype, make him the guy who we're really going to miss and we don't even know it. But the baseball people are finding it out! Go Evan!!
I see far more downside in using Sharpley this year vs. JC continuing to develop behind a more experienced line.
I Hope Haywood has a great year,and Charlie learns the World doesn't revolve around himself.
I'm very interested to see the offensive play calls with Haywood at the helm. You'd expect that a running backs coach would certainly be more committed than Charlie to establishing the run. I hope so.
I am a strong supporter of the Irish as well as a 3rd generation alumni (my daughter will be 4th generation when she graduates next year)but I am not a blind supporter. I believe in Charlie and what the Irish are capable of but I have also seen the weaknesses that you pointed out in the previous column. You can only overcome a weakness when you recognize and accept it as a flaw/potential flaw. I believe in Charlis and his ability ot overcome some "percieved" issues but I stand behind your honesty and objectivity in pointing them out. We all must remember that even though we have opinions, Charlie is the only one who really knows the team and their capabilities and therefore his decisions, whether successful or not, are certainly made with the most information available (where our comments are not).
Go Irish.
You're delusional if you think something you post has any effect on recruiting.
Are you serious?
You're absolutely right about the timing of this article. I have been a long time, avid reader of the Rock Report and I know that many of my fellow classmates and I would have had second thoughts if your previous article had been published during the course of the last season.
Please continue to consider the great responsibility that comes with your pivotal influence on Notre Dame recruiting. We need your help!
Your 4th year at a major college let alone ND, should be a good year period.
Weis won on Willingham recruits now it is time for him to win on his own recruits.
Gawdallmighty AJG. Don't post/link anything by David Haugh here or anywhere else. He is fraud as a writer and a complete, unadulterated Irish Hater. Need to take a shower after seeing that linked story...
domer oc -- Time for a quick lesson on the internet age. Just like fans, sites like NDNation are one of the main way recruits gather information about the direction of the program. It's not speculation or delusion, it's fact as told to us by those who speak to recruits and why Mike Frank urges everyone to show restraint and thought even on message boards.
Recruits read the articles and message boards and site them often during the process. And even if they don't happen visit the site, opposing coaches both email negative articles to recruits and print out them out and mail them the hard copies.
Many times their entire families are reading the site.
You'll notice that the Florida boards actively censor information for this reason.
"Wise men are cautious where fools are sure."
I wanna see JC's beard
Post a Comment